As part of his schoolwork, my nephew is working on a family tree showing his forebears. The assignment seems fairly flexible: Show as many ancestors as you can, or, if you don’t have much information, focus in greater depth on the more recent ones you do know.
My brother-in-law is just getting started on his genealogy, so I suggested beginning with what he knew: the identities of his parents and grandparents. I pointed Christopher toward the California Birth Index, 1905-1995, as he should be listed there, and toward Lindsay Fulton’s Vita Brevis post on Social Security Administration applications, since information on his twentieth-century ancestors will be found in those files. When he’s finished there, Christopher can start working back through the various Federal Censuses available on Ancestry.com. He tells me he has a family tree of his father’s family, created by a great-aunt, and this will be helpful as he becomes familiar with the various vital and civil registration databases to be found at FamilySearch.org, Ancestry.com, and elsewhere.
For my sister and me, we have an embarrassment of riches: genealogies have been written about the families of three of our four grandparents. My 2003 book on the Le Roys (written with Newbold Le Roy, 3rd) brings the Steward, White, Le Roy, Rutgers, and van den Berg families in our line down to Meg’s marriage in 2002. My Ayer genealogy (published in 1993) covers the Ayer, Ilsley, Wheaton, Cook, Fanning, Deake, Colt, Travis, and Hutchins families back into the seventeenth century. Finally, a 1925 Glidden genealogy follows the Glidden line down to the birth of my maternal grandmother in 1903, and a more recent one covers my mother and her descendants.
I can, and will, give my nephew the information on Meg’s (and my) recent ancestry, but the project also makes me think about how I would begin again, if I had to start over. As I say, there are many genealogies available on the various parts of my family; it gives me pause to think how long it took me to find the ones available when I started this process the first time, as well as their strengths and weaknesses, but on balance I’ve been incredibly lucky in the work many other genealogists have done and are doing on questions having to do with my ancestry.
Then there are the masses of published vital records, and, since the 1990s, the incalculable array of databases now available online. Writing that 2003 genealogy was made much easier with access to The New York Times and, with more recent books, the Massachusetts Vital Records, 1841-1915, databases available at AmericanAncestors.org.
The lists goes on – I’m so thankful for Findagrave.com and Fold3.com – but what ties all these different record types together is the habit of mind, developed in the stacks at NEHGS and the New York Genealogical & Biographical Society, of checking one source against another, going from book to microfiche to commercial database to book to manuscript to manuscript to published vital record to…
Well, you get the picture!
6 thoughts on “Getting the picture, or, reflections on research”
Couldn’t help but note Cornelia WHEATON. If you haven’t seen my friend and collaborator’s website on WHEATONs Check out number #330 Cornelia’s father. http://www.wheatonjk.co.uk/Robert_and_Alice_BOWEN.htm
If you know any Wheaton surnamed males send them my way! https://sites.google.com/site/wheatonsurname/home. Our DNA project is tantalizingly close to locating Robert WHEATON the immigrant’s origins in SW England or Wales.
Kelly WHEATON (WHEATON by blood and marriage!)
Thanks, Kelly. There are might be Wheaton descendants in the male line of some of my great-great-great-uncles: Edward Wheaton (1837-1905), Charles Augustus Wheaton (1853-1916), or Allan Givens Wheaton (1866-1934). (They were the offspring of two marriages — hence the age gap — and among their father’s seventeen children.) By the way, I have more information on the children of Charles Augustus Wheaton Sr. by both wives.
Scott anything beyond what is listed on the website would be greatly appreciated. Contact me at a4est42 at gmail . com. And feel free to pass information along to any WHEATONs you run into. We are still actively searching for a descendant of Robert’s son Obadiah for DNA testing. And also for Christopher WHEATON of Hull who is sometimes mentioned as a child of Robert but we suspect more likely a brother or cousin if related at all. He is never listed with Robert in any official document and not mentioned in Robert’s will or property transactions.
Cannot resist weighing in with a female \Wheaton problem! Did Mary Wheaton, d/o the Rev. Ephraim Wheaton, who married Richard (3) Bullock, have a grandson named Wheaton Bullock? Betty Lou Morris email@example.com
That would make sense. Although I have no grandchildren for this union. Children are Ephraim, Joseph, Huldah, Richard, Mary, Ellis and Robert. All of the names save Ellis are ancestral names—Robert being the immigrant and Richard being the father of Alice BOWEN.
Among the names you mention is the van den Berg family. Is this the family traced back to Gysbert Van Den Bergh, born and married in Holland, but in Beverwyck, now Albany, by, probably, the 1660s? I have some connections with that family.