[Editor’s Note: Between June and August of this year, Alicia wrote two series on her research and writing methodologies. In the interest of bringing them together, and sharing them with a fresh audience, they are offered again, with some of the author’s commentary. The first of these two posts appeared here:]
From Composition: Part One:
Many people enjoy fishing, but not as many enjoy cleaning the catch. That is why we all have piles of research sitting waiting to be compiled into finished accounts. In some cases we may have entered our data into a genealogical database, but as nice as they are for sorting a multitude of facts, there is still no replacement for a well-written genealogical story.
I developed the Early New England Families Study Project format to make my job easier, and I also thought it might be useful to help others put their family histories in writing. I call this format “Register Style with subtitles.” It is my “map.”
From Composition: Part Two:
Proofreading is not a one-time event. It is, from the beginning of your work, constant, relentless, incessant, unceasing, inexorable, and thankless (nobody notices what you did proofread successfully, only what you didn’t). If you are a fan of TV shows like NCIS, pretend you are Ducky performing an autopsy!
From Composition: Part Three:
Don’t tell Henry Hoff, editor of the NEHGS Register, but I do not format my Early New England Families Study Project footnotes in proper Register Style. There are two reasons for this. First, I am comfortable with my own footnoting style developed over the years following basic rules I learned in school from the Chicago Manual of Style and other such guides, which is very similar to Register Style. Second, so far no one has made me change.
The point being that although there are times when strict footnoting laws apply (such as writing one’s dissertation), the only reason for a footnote is to provide the reader with enough information to locate the source if they so desire. A good full citation needs at least the following – author, title, number of volumes if a multi-volume work, year and place of publication, and the short form that will be used thereafter. For example: Henry Porter Andrews, The Descendants of John Porter of Windsor, Conn., 1635-9, 2 vols. (Saratoga Springs, N.Y.: 1893) [hereinafter John Porter]. A good “cheat sheet” for genealogical citations is the bibliography to Torrey’s Early New England Marriages, downloadable as a pdf.
Footnotes also provide the opportunity to add collateral information and explanations that do not “fit” into the text, although if your footnote gets longer than your text, the information might really belong there.
From Composition: Part Four:
As I tie up loose ends on the Early New England Families Study Project sketch for Richard Newton, it is time to assess the work.
Newton’s sketch is fairly short, four pages at the moment: his birth and ancestry are unknown, he did not participate in town or colony governments, was not in trouble with the courts, and left no interesting biographical highlights. A lot of information was already in print about the Newton family, including a full transcription of Richard’s will in the Newton Genealogy.
The Newton Genealogy also includes short abstracts of six grantor deeds by Richard. I ran into a little problem checking these against the microfilm because the original record books suffer from a lot of wear, especially on page corners where the page numbers are nearly all obliterated. I had to do a lot of “by guess and by golly” and finally resorted to using the dates of recording given in the index to locate what I needed. The abstracts appear to be accurate so far, though minimal, so I will include more details, particularly for the deeds from Richard to his sons.
All in all, this has been a fairly routine sketch that will easily total 25 hours of time before it is finalized, indexed, and published. As I said when I started this series, about as exciting as watching paint dry, but I hope it gives you an idea of the process.
6 thoughts on “Now, it’s time to write”
Oh, Alicia, I always appreciate your postings and never compare reading your thoughts to watching drying paint! (I love your self deprecating humor.) As long as I am working on my genealogy, I want to use best practices.
I am one of those with stacks and stacks of paperwork, shelves of books, boxes of old photos, and several versions of my written research in several electronic devices. In between doing everything else in life, I try to devote time to consolidate what genealogical information that I have, and to find new information. It feels overwhelming! But then I read one of your essays and feel the task ahead is more manageable.
Years ago, at the very first “Come Home to New England,” your colleagues said that we should send a copy of our genealogies in progress to NEHGS, not waiting for them to be “complete” (since they never are), lest our work be lost. But my data is in fairly chaotic shape! Perhaps, in the near future, you can post your advice for those of us in my situation.
You are not alone !
Candy, thank you. I’ve received a number of questions similar to yours which I will address in upcoming posts. Keep the questions coming (and everyone else is welcome to add theirs).
I am currently taking an online class based on Tom Jones’ book Mastering Genealogical Proof. It is hammering home the reasons for correctly citing sources, analyzing evidence, and writing the proof. It is a scary, intimidating process for novice “genealogist” such as myself. I admire anyone who has mastered the art, and it is an art as well as a science, and therein lies the beauty of a well written ‘genealogical story’.
Jeanie, good for you for starting the journey. Take it one step at a time and remember that an old lady like me has been doing this now for the better part of five decades — whoa, that makes me feel really old — but knowledge is cumulative.