Instead of identifying a person’s date of birth, death certificates and gravestones sometimes identify the deceased person’s age in years, months, and days. But what is the purpose of giving an exact age rather than a birth date, and how is this age determined? Are there any consistent rules for this process?
In Colonial America it was traditional practice to inscribe a tombstone with the deceased’s age in years, months, and days. For example, the cemetery marker for Griffith Thomas was inscribed with the following: “In Memory of Griffith Thomas who departed this life October 25th 1800 Aged 58 years, 9 months and 10 days.”
While it was customary to record a person’s age narratively, it is unlikely that the informant presented this information in that format. Rather, the informant would have provided the clerk/engraver with the deceased’s date of birth, and the specific age would be calculated for the gravestone. To help determine the date of birth of your ancestors, I include several links to tombstone calculators below:
Nineteenth and twentieth century death records also recorded the age at death, but this practice was not just customary. Instead, these modern death records provided statistical information for the nation’s politicians and doctors, as well as for life insurance companies. For example, in a Report of the Vital Statistics of the United States, made to the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, the author reported that the average age at death of the residents of Plympton, Plymouth Colony, Massachusetts, between the years 1812 and 1842 was 40 years, 10 months, 25 15/24 days. I have included a link to the 1857 report here.
Because the death information was originally recorded using age in years, months, and days, the above statistical information would have been easier to calculate. Therefore, some (but not all) town, counties, and states recorded deaths using this format.
7 thoughts on “Calculating age at death – and why”
Could the recording of the exact age in years, months and days have been influenced by the change in the calendar? (In the event, say, that one was born under the old calendar and died under the new?)
Kendall and Jennifer,
Your suggestion is a good one, and one that occurred to me as well. Not only did I scour the NEHGS collection for information on double dating and tombstones, but I also asked my fellow NEHGS colleagues for their opinion on the matter. I was unable to find any information that would point to the tradition being influenced by the change in calendars. The only evidence I could locate pointed to it being a traditional style at the time.
However, if you find any evidence to the contrary, please send me the information. I would love to get a better understanding of the origin of this tradition.
If you ponder it.. The format gives a more humanistic feel. Born ??/??/???? Died ??/??/???? is COLD mathematics; where as Aged ?? year ? months ?? days is more artistic/angelic.
I think Kendall’s point is a good one. If the idea was to provide statistical information, why not just put a birth date as well as death date on the headstone?
I always thought the custom might be due to different Biblical verses that refer to the “number of days” such as in Psalm 90:12 or Psalm 23 “Surely goodness and love will follow me all the days of my life, and I will dwell in the house of the LORD forever”
A long time ago in my old Puritan hometown I heard that one’s birthdate was not inscribed on the tombstone because one was born in a state of sin.