In 2010 I visited the Smithsonian National Museum of American History. An exhibit that caught my eye was called Within these Walls, which told the stories of five families who lived in a house in Ipswich, Massachusetts for more than two centuries. The period covered ranges from the Choate family as American colonists in the 1750s to the Scott family during the Home Front of the 1940s. The second family covered, under the period of “Revolutionaries – 1777–1789,” was the Dodge family, under the heading “the Dodges and Chance.” The Dodge household included an African-American man named Chance, as noted in Abraham Dodge’s 1786 will, where Abraham left his wife Bethiah “all my Right to the Service of my Negro Man Chance.” At the time I saw this exhibit, that reference was essentially all the show’s curators knew about Chance.
I thought I might have the right Chance in Essex County, and then theorized that by the early 1770s, Chance was a slave of Isaac Story; still, in 1786 he was a slave belonging to Abraham Dodge. Dodge’s brother Thomas was married to Isaac Story’s sister Eleanor/Ellen, so the two men shared a family connection. I did a series of Google searches with Chance, Story, Dodge, Ipswich, Marblehead, Negro, and other search terms in and out of quotation marks. Many of the terms above, even when applying to people – Chance, Story, and Dodge – are also words themselves, so I came up with many results that had no bearing on the subjects I was searching. Finally, though, I found the “clinching” document, a slave lease from 20 May 1777, where Chance, at fourteen years of age, was leased to Abraham Dodge of Ipswich!
With the assistance of Bob Booth, a Marblehead historian, we uncovered further details about Chance Bradstreet back in Marblehead, to which he apparently returned at some point and where he died in 1810. This twelve-year lease may have kept Chance in servitude longer than other people of color in Massachusetts, as the 1783 Quock Walker case stated that slave owners had no recourse in court against their slaves; how quickly this ruling took effect is uncertain.
I had also hoped that I might be able to identify descendants of Chance, although since I began my research I have not found any evidence that Chance ever married or had children. Still, a difficulty in African-American research is sometimes earlier people of color may be only be identified for a “pocket of time,” for a few decades, and getting the necessary links for relatives down to the present day is not always possible. I was happy about the material I did find about Chance between his birth in 1762 and death in 1810, his series of owners, his likely mother, and other local data.
The entire story of my research was written up in American Ancestors magazine. The staff at the Smithsonian has revamped the exhibit with significant detail on Chance and the addition of enhanced visitor experiences to help tell this story over the coming year. The new facts uncovered help delineate the changing legal and social forms affecting a formerly enslaved person of color following the American Revolution. I encourage people to check out the updated exhibit, which is now part of a transformed thematic second floor west wing featuring exhibits highlighting The Nation We Build Together, which debuts today.